masthead

                                              

                                                                   

     

       Cake Poker 

                                                                   


                                                                                                        

Advanced Learning Articles
"If I know something you don't know-I take your money."
-Sklansky
                                                                                            
 
  
                                           Looking at the Meta-Game
 
 
The "meta-game", where it concerns poker, is actually a broad concept which includes
 several meaningful variations.  In the broadest sense its implications are fairly abstract
 as it represents all poker play which is happening everywhere at this moment, in the
 recent past, and the various trends which may be evolving out of all that.  The only
 way that I can see this may be useful for poker players to understand "meta-game" in
 that sense is to know that there are new general trends, or types of play, occurring in
 poker all the time, to be on the lookout for those trends, and to adjust one's game
 when it might be advantageous to do so.


 I
n the next and fairly more narrow sense of it, "meta-game" refers to information that
 we can gather about our opponents which occurs outside of the immediate poker
 environment, or the table we are sitting at across from them.  This is not as weird,
 useless, or farfetched as it sounds-quite the opposite.  This has become a very
 significant factor for online poker players due to advent of tools such as poker tracker,
 which allow you to display the styles, stats, and tendencies of almost any player you
 might be up against.  At poker sights which offer the compatibility for the data, you can
 gain a serious advantage over your opponents using these tools.  Its obvious that if
 you know weather or not your opponent is more likely to make a certain call, or if he
 is likely to be bluffing or semi-bluffing, your bottom line at the end of the day is going to
 be higher.  After all, information is the key to successful poker play.  To a lesser extent
 the note-taking tools that pretty much all online sites offer also support this concept.  Its
 the same thing, just not as comprehensive, as the notes you take yourself about an
 opponent only represent play which you have observed over a short period of time, and
 can often yield faulty results.

 The most commonly used, and probably most narrow definition of "meta-game" refers
 to how decisions which we are making in the present are likely to affect results down the
 road.  This is another important definition, and almost all top-pros do incorporate this
 kind of thinking into their play at one point or another.  I would break this type of
 "meta-game" thinking down further into two basic situations.

 First you might to decide to do something purposely in order to create an effect down
 the line, such as making a loose call in order to represent yourself as something of a
 station, and deter weak bets being made against you.  This is pretty common, and all
 forms of "creating deception" are actually part of this meta-game catagory.

 The second part of this has to do with situations in which you are faced with a tough
 hand decision of some kind, a real 50/50 type play.  Instead of flipping a coin though,
 you resort to your meta-game thinking, and consider how your decision will affect your
 table image or other factors which might affect success later on.  In his recent book
 "Hand by Hand" Gus Hanson talks about a hand at the Aussie Millions where he made
 an unlikely call against a monster bluff due to the fact that folding would cost him his
 "table captain" image.  He already knew that his opponent was a big bluffer and that
 there was at least a good chance that his own Ace high put him in the lead, but that
 in itself wasn't enough to make the call.  He was on the fence about it until he started
 thinking about what would happen to his table image if he folded.  That's a perfect
 example of meta-game thinking in this sense.

 I hope this has been a helpful guide to the "meta-game", and has served to expand
 a few horizons.  It is a useful and probably necessary concept for serious online players
 to understand.  Certainly there are advantages to be had if these ideas are followed up
 to their natural conclusions, such as looking into poker-tracker, and beginning to
 incorporate different kinds of thinking into tough hand decisions which may affect
 the outcome of later plays.  Best of luck with your own "meta-game"! 

                                                             

   Play Online Poker


                                                           


Poker-opes.Com 2009 All Rights Reserved| Terms of Use